今天大学路小编整理了雅思剑桥12Passage1：不同寻常的木材 2023年2月1日雅思阅读真题回忆相关信息，希望在这方面能够更好帮助到大家。
本文目录一览：
雅思剑桥12Passage1：不同寻常的木材
您好，我是专注留学考试规划和留学咨询的小钟老师。在追寻留学梦想的路上，选择合适的学校和专业，准备相关考试，都可能让人感到迷茫和困扰。作为一名有经验的留学顾问，我在此为您提供全方位的专业咨询和指导。欢迎随时提问！
剑桥雅思12是现在备考雅思的最新资料，不知道同学们有没有呢？今天就和小钟老师一起来看看雅思剑桥12Passage1：不同寻常的木材。
文章结构
体裁：说明文
主要内容：介绍了一种不同寻常的材奉I——软木
结构：
1段软木来源、特性、用途的简介
2段栓皮栎树皮的特性
3段栓皮栎树的丝长环境
4段软木的生长周期长和收获间隔长
5段软木的收割和加
6段软木的现状（或缺点）：被其他材料代替
7段软木的前景（或优点）：高品质、环保
考题解析：
Questions 1-5
1题目归类：TRUE/FALSVNOT GIVEN
此类题型属于细节题，是雅思阅读中难度较小的题目此类题目考台题表述的息与原文相关信息的关系。在解题时，根据题目的定位词回，1文找到相关的语，如果原文与题目表述的信息一致，答案为TRUE；如果原文与题目表述的息矛」答案为FALSE；如果从原文的信息不能确定题目中所表述的ffi息，答案为NOT GIVEN
文章结构
体裁：说明文
主要内容：介绍了一种不同寻常的材奉I——软木
结构：
1段软木来源、特性、用途的简介
2段栓皮栎树皮的特性
3段栓皮栎树的丝长环境
4段软木的生长周期长和收获间隔长
5段软木的收割和加
6段软木的现状（或缺点）：被其他材料代替
7段软木的前景（或优点）：高品质、环保
考题解析：
Questions 1-5
1题目归类：TRUE/FALSVNOT GIVEN
此类题型属于细节题，是雅思阅读中难度较小的题目此类题目考台题表述的息与原文相关信息的关系。在解题时，根据题目的定位词回，1文找到相关的语，如果原文与题目表述的信息一致，答案为TRUE；如果原文与题目表述的息矛」答案为FALSE；如果从原文的信息不能确定题目中所表述的ffi息，答案为NOT GIVEN
Questions 6-13
·题目归类：Notes Completion
此类题型属于细节题，重点考査定位、提取、归纳信息的能力，解答此类题3人才是先根据题目中的定位词，确定答案在原文的范围，再根据句意同义替换，提取，归纳 相关信息，回原文中找到相符的语言重现，从而确定答案。注意在填写答案时，都是原文原词原顺序。
希望以上的答复能对您的留学申请有所帮助。如果您有任何更详细的问题或需要进一步的协助，我强烈推荐您访问我们的留学官方网站 ，在那里您可以找到更多专业的留学考试规划和留学资料以及一对一的咨询服务。祝您留学申请顺利！
2023年2月1日雅思阅读真题回忆
您好，我是专注留学考试规划和留学咨询的小钟老师。在追寻留学梦想的路上，选择合适的学校和专业，准备相关考试，都可能让人感到迷茫和困扰。作为一名有经验的留学顾问，我在此为您提供全方位的专业咨询和指导。欢迎随时提问！
阅读考试一直是不少学生比较头疼的部分，那么2月份的雅思阅读考试真题如何呢？这估计是不少人士感兴趣的话题，和小钟老师一起来看看2023年2月1日雅思阅读真题回忆，欢迎阅读。
2023年2月1日雅思阅读真题回忆
权威点评
这次考试阅读部分的第1篇文章不论是从主题和题型来看都比较简单，是建议尽可能在15分钟内高效完成的类型。第3篇重复考到了以前的旧题。3篇文章的内容，人文社科类的偏多。总体而言，这次的阅读难易程度居中。
Passage 1
题目
英国农业
话题分类
社会科学
题型及对应数量
填空题:7题
判断题：6题
内容回忆
本文讲英国农业问题，农作物对环境的影响，以及粮食不足的问题。
文章一部分讲在非洲进口粮食会更加环保，节省欧洲用地和降低对环境的影响，但后面又说在欧洲本地种植农作物也挺好，不过成本较高。
题目回忆
暂缺
参考阅读
C12T6P1
Passage 2
题目
古埃及壁画
话题分类
人文科学
题型及数量
人名观点匹配题、填空题
内容回忆
在古埃及壁画上发现海运，由此列出4个科学家对此的观点和研究成果。
题目回忆
暂缺
参考阅读
C7T4P1
Passage 3
题目
Communication in science/科学界交流
话题分类
人文科学
题型及数量
选择题（5）、判断题（4）、Summary填空题（5）
内容回忆
参考原文：
AScience plays an increasingly significant role in people’s lives, making the faithful communication of scientific developments more important than ever.Yet such communication is fraught with challenges that can easily distort discussions, leading to unnecessary confusion and misunderstandings.
BSome problems stem from the esoteric nature of current research and the associated difficulty of finding sufficiently faithful terminology. Abstraction and complexity are not signs that a given scientific direction is wrong, as some commentators have suggested, but are instead a tribute to the success of human ingenuity in meeting the increasingly complex challenges that nature presents. They can, however, make communication more difficult. But many of the biggest challenges for science reporting arise because in areas of evolving research, scientists themselves often only partly understand the full implications of any particular advance or development. Since that dynamicapplies to most of the scientific developments that directly affect people’s lives global warming, cancer research, diet studies—learning how to overcome it is critical to spurringa more informed scientific debate among the broader public.
CAmbiguous word choices are the source of some misunderstandings. Scientists often employ colloquial terminology, which they then assign a specific meaning that is impossible to fathomwithout proper training.The term “relativity,” for example, is intrinsically misleading. Many interpret the theory to mean that everything is relative and there are no absolutes. Yet although the measurements any observer makes depend on his coordinates and reference frame, the physical phenomena he measures have an invariant description that transcends that observer’s particular coordinates. Einstein’s theory of relativity is really about finding an invariant description of physical
phenomena. True, Einstein agreed with the idea that his theory would have been better named “Invariantentheorie.” But the term “relativity” was already entrenched at the time for him to change.
D“The uncertainty principle” is another frequently abused term. It is sometimesinterpreted as a limitation on observers and their ability to make measurements.
E But it is not about intrinsic limitations on any one particular measurement;it is about the inability to precisely measure particular pairs of quantitiessimultaneously? The first interpretation is perhaps more engaging from aphilosophical or political perspective. It’s just not what the science is about.
FEven the word “theory” can be a problem. Unlike most people, who usethe word to describe a passing conjecture that they often regard as suspect,physicists have very specific ideas in mind when they talk about theories.For physicists, theories entail a definite physical framework embodied in aset of fundamental assumptions about the world that lead to a specific set ofequations and predictions—ones that are borne out by successful predictions.Theories aren’t necessarily shown to be correct or complete immediately.Even Einstein took the better part of a decade to develop the correct versionof his theory of general relativity. But eventually both the ideas and themeasurements settle down and theories are either proven correct, abandoned orabsorbed into other, more encompassing theories.
G“Global warming” is another example of problematic terminology.Climatologists predict more drastic fluctuations in temperatureandrainfall— not necessarily that every place will be warmer. The namesometimes subverts the debate, since it lets people argue that their winter wasworse, so how could there be global warming? Clearly “global climate change”would have been a better name. But not all problems stem solely from poorword choices. Some stem from the intrinsically complex nature of much ofmodern science. Science sometimes transcends this limitation: remarkably,chemists were able to detail the precise chemical processes involved in thedestruction of the ozone layer, making the evidence that chlorofluorocarbongases (Freon, for example) were destroying the ozone layer indisputable.
HA better understanding of the mathematical significance of results and lessinsistence on a simple story would help to clarifymany scientific discussions.For several months, Harvard was tortured months, Harvard was torturedby empty debates over the relative intrinsic scientific abilities of men andwomen. One of the more amusing aspects of the discussion was that thosewho believed in the differences and those who didn’t used the same evidenceabout gender-specific special ability. How could that be? The answer is that thedata shows no substantial effects. Social factors might account for these tinydifferences, which in any case have an unclear connection to scientific ability.Not much of a headline when phrased that way, is it? Each type of sciencehas its own source of complexity and potential for miscommunication. Yetthere are steps we can take to improve public understanding in all cases. Thefirst would be to inculcate greater understanding and acceptance of indirectscientific evidence. The information from an unmanned space mission is noless legitimate than the information from one in which people are on board.
IThis doesn’t mean never questioning an interpretation, but it also doesn’tmean equating indirect evidence with blind belief, as people sometimessuggest. Second, we might need different standards for evaluating science withurgent policy implications than research with purely theoretical value. Whenscientists say they are not certain about their predictions, it doesn’t necessarilymean they’ve found nothing substantial. It would be better if scientists weremore open about the mathematical significance of their results and if thepublic didn’t treat math as quite so scary; statistics and errors, which tell us theuncertainty in a measurement, give us the tools to evaluate new developmentsfairly.
JBut most important, people have to recognize that science can be complex.If we accept only simple stories, the description will necessarily be distorted.When advances are subtle or complicated, scientists should be willing to gothe extra distance to give proper explanations and the public should be morepatient about the truth. Even so, some difficulties are unavoidable. Mostdevelopments reflect work in progress, so the story is complex because no oneyet knows the big picture.
题目回忆
27.why the faithful science communication important?
Answer:
AScience plays an increasingly significant role in people's lives.
28.what is the reason that the anthor believe for the biggest challenges for science reporting?
Answer:
C Scientists do nottotallycomprehend the meaning of certain scientific evolution.
29.according to the 3th paragraph, the reference to the term and example of“theory of relativity ”is to demonstrate
answer:
B common people may be misled by the inaccurate choice of scientific phrase
30.which one is a good example of appropriate word choice
answer:
D Freon's destructive process on environmental
31.what is surprising finding of the harvard debates in the passage?
answer:
B The proof applied by both sides seemed to be of no big difference
32.True
33.Not given
34.Notgiven
35.False
36.wordchoices
37.colloquial terminology
38.observer
39.description
40.general relativity
参考阅读
C12T8P2
以上是小编整理的2月1日雅思真题，谢谢浏览。
希望以上的答复能对您的留学申请有所帮助。如果您有任何更详细的问题或需要进一步的协助，我强烈推荐您访问我们的留学官方网站 ，在那里您可以找到更多专业的留学考试规划和留学资料以及一对一的咨询服务。祝您留学申请顺利！
请问2023年3月2日雅思阅读考试真题及答案
您好，我是专注留学考试规划和留学咨询的小钟老师。选择留学是人生重要的决策之一，而作为您的指导，我非常高兴能为您提供最准确的留学解答和规划。无论您的问题是关于考试准备、专业选择、申请流程还是学校信息，我都在这里为您解答。更多留学资讯和学校招生介绍，欢迎随时访问。3月2号的雅思考试已经顺利结束，真题及答案也全面新鲜出炉，想必大家都是非常关注的。那么今天就和小钟老师看一看2023年3月2日雅思阅读考试真题及答案。
Passage 1
文章题材：说明文（人文社科）
文章题目：Australian Rock Art澳大利亚岩画艺术
文章难度：★★
文章内容：澳大利亚岩石艺术的起源；考古学家研究结果；目前存在的困难
题型及数量：5表格填空题+3填空题+5判断题
题目及答案：
1. ceremonies
2. territory
3. wandjina
4. adornments
5. mouths
6. 1977
7. sketches
8. dress
9. TRUE
10. FALSE
11. NOT GIVEN
12. FALSE
13. TRUE
可参考真题：C10T3P3：Beyond the blue horizon
Passage 2
文章题材：说明文（自然科普）
文章题目：Useful Plants绿色植物吸收室内污染物
文章难度：★★★★
文章内容：暂缺
题型及数量：段落匹配5+匹配题3+单句填空题4
题目及答案：
14. 暂缺
15. D
16. G
17. B
18. 暂缺
19. B
20. E
21. D
22. A
23. building materials
24. small pores
25. ventilation
26. perfect ornamentals
可参考真题：C12T5P1：Cork
Passage 3
文章题材：说明文（商业科普）
文章题目：Business Research
文章难度：★★★
文章内容：目前大部分的商业研究不具备实用性；为什么会跟实际脱钩，分析了原因；目前发生的变化，实用性差的状况正在改善。
题型及数量：单选题5+判断题5+句子配对题4
题目及答案：
27. D
28. D
29. C
30. A
31. B
32. NO
33. NO
34. YES
35. NOT GIVEN
36. NOT GIVEN
37. B
38. 暂缺
39. D
40. A
可参考真题：C12T8P3：UK companies need more effective boards of directors
以上信息希望能帮助您在留学申请的道路上少走弯路。如果您还有更多问题或需要深入探讨，不要犹豫，您可以在我们的留学官方网站上找到更丰富的考试资讯、留学指导和一对一专家咨询服务。我们的团队始终站在您的角度，为您的留学梦想全力以赴。祝您申请顺利！
以上，就是大学路小编给大家带来的雅思剑桥12Passage1：不同寻常的木材 2023年2月1日雅思阅读真题回忆全部内容，希望对大家有所帮助！
免责声明：文章内容来自网络，如有侵权请及时联系删除。
